[1] Wu, D. and R. Wang, Combined cooling, heating and power: A review. progress in energy and combustion science, 2006. 32(5-6): p. 459-495.
[2] Kialashaki, Y., A linear programming optimization model for optimal operation strategy design and sizing of the CCHP systems. Energy Efficiency, 2018. 11: p. 225-238.
[3] Haghghi, M.A., et al., Thermodynamic assessment of a novel multi-generation solid oxide fuel cell-based system for production of electrical power, cooling, fresh water, and hydrogen. Energy conversion and management, 2019. 197: p. 111895.
[4] Ehyaei, M., et al., Energy, exergy and economic analyses for the selection of working fluid and metal oxide nanofluids in a parabolic trough collector. Solar Energy, 2019. 187: p. 175-184.
[5] Yılmaz, İ.H., A. Mwesigye, and F. Kılıç, Prioritization of heat transfer fluids in parabolic trough solar systems using CFD-assisted AHP-VIKOR approach. Renewable Energy, 2023. 210: p. 751-768.
[6] Mwesigye, A. and İ.H. Yılmaz, Thermal and thermodynamic benchmarking of liquid heat transfer fluids in a high concentration ratio parabolic trough solar collector system. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2020. 319: p. 114151.
[7] Arslan, F.M. and H. Günerhan. Investigation of energetic and exergetic performances of parabolic trough collector with using different heat transfer fluids. in E3S Web of Conferences. 2019. EDP Sciences.
[8] Okonkwo, E.C., M. Abid, and T.A. Ratlamwala, Numerical analysis of heat transfer enhancement in a parabolic trough collector based on geometry modifications and working fluid usage. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 2018. 140(5): p. 051009.
[9] Bellos, E., et al., The use of gas working fluids in parabolic trough collectors–An energetic and exergetic analysis. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016. 109: p. 1-14.
[10] Vutukuru, R., A.S. Pegallapati, and R. Maddali, Suitability of various heat transfer fluids for high temperature solar thermal systems. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019. 159: p. 113973.
[11] Zaharil, H. and M. Hasanuzzaman, Modelling and performance analysis of parabolic trough solar concentrator for different heat transfer fluids under Malaysian condition. Renewable Energy, 2020. 149: p. 22-41.
[12] Pan, C.A., et al. Identification of optimum molten salts for use as heat transfer fluids in parabolic trough CSP plants. A techno-economic comparative optimization. in AIP Conference Proceedings. 2018. AIP Publishing.
[13] Islam, M., M. Hasanuzzaman, and N. Rahim, Modelling and analysis of the effect of different parameters on a parabolic-trough concentrating solar system. RSC advances, 2015. 5(46): p. 36540-36546.
[14] Brahim, T. and A. Jemni, Comparative Study of Parabolic Trough Solar Collector using Sysltherm-800 and Therminol-VP1 Non-metallic Nanofluids. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 2023: p. 101951.
[15] Ekiciler, R., et al., Effect of hybrid nanofluid on heat transfer performance of parabolic trough solar collector receiver. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2021. 143: p. 1637-1654.
[16] Bellos, E. and C. Tzivanidis, Thermal efficiency enhancement of nanofluid-based parabolic trough collectors. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2019. 135: p. 597-608.
[17] Mwesigye, A. and J.P. Meyer, Optimal thermal and thermodynamic performance of a solar parabolic trough receiver with different nanofluids and at different concentration ratios. Applied Energy, 2017. 193: p. 393-413.
[18] Al-Oran, O., F. Lezsovits, and A. Aljawabrah, Exergy and energy amelioration for parabolic trough collector using mono and hybrid nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2020. 140: p. 1579-1596.
[19] Alashkar, A. and M. Gadalla. Evaluation of thermal energy storage (TES) systems on thermo-economic characteristics of PTSC solar-based power generation plants. in ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. 2018. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
[20] Biencinto, M., et al., Performance model and annual yield comparison of parabolic-trough solar thermal power plants with either nitrogen or synthetic oil as heat transfer fluid. Energy conversion and management, 2014. 87: p. 238-249.
[21] Ramamurthi, P.V. and E.R. Samuel Nadar, An integrated SiGe based thermoelectric generator with parabolic trough collector using nano HTF for effective harvesting of solar radiant energy. Journal of Electronic Materials, 2019. 48: p. 7780-7791.
[22] Assareh, E., et al., A Transient simulation for a novel solar-geothermal cogeneration system with a selection of heat transfer fluids using Thermodynamics analysis and ANN intelligent (AI) modeling. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2023: p. 120698.
[23] Guo, J., X. Huai, and Z. Liu, Performance investigation of parabolic trough solar receiver. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016. 95: p. 357-364.
[24] Li, P., et al., A cascade organic Rankine cycle power generation system using hybrid solar energy and liquefied natural gas. Solar Energy, 2016. 127: p. 136-146.
[25] Shuang, Y., et al., ANALYSIS OF HEAT TRANSFER AND IRREVERSIBILITY OF ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLE EVAPORATOR FOR SELECTING WORKING FLUID AND OPERATING CONDITIONS. Thermal Science, 2020. 24.
[26] Wang, Y., et al., Thermodynamic performance comparison between ORC and Kalina cycles for multi-stream waste heat recovery. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017. 143: p. 482-492.
[27] Bi, Y., et al., Performance analysis of solar air conditioning system based on the independent-developed solar parabolic trough collector. Energy, 2020. 196: p. 117075.
[28] Shirazi, A., et al., Solar-powered absorption chillers: A comprehensive and critical review. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018. 171: p. 59-81.
[29] Avanessian, T. and M. Ameri, Energy, exergy, and economic analysis of single and double effect LiBr–H2O absorption chillers. Energy and Buildings, 2014. 73: p. 26-36.
[30] Bellos, E. and C. Tzivanidis, Analytical expression of parabolic trough solar collector performance. Designs, 2018. 2(1): p. 9.
[31] Al-Oran, O., F. Lezsovits, and A. Aljawabrah, Exergy and energy amelioration for parabolic trough collector using mono and hybrid nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2020: p. 1-18.
[32] Eisavi, B., et al., Thermodynamic analysis of a novel combined cooling, heating and power system driven by solar energy. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018. 129: p. 1219-1229.
[33] Ghaebi, H., et al., Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a cogeneration system for power and hydrogen production purpose based on TRR method and using low grade geothermal source. Geothermics, 2018. 71: p. 132-145.
[34] Gogoi, T. and P. Hazarika, Comparative assessment of four novel solar based triple effect absorption refrigeration systems integrated with organic Rankine and Kalina cycles. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020. 226: p. 113561.
[35] Zarei, A., et al., Energy, exergy and economic analysis of a novel solar driven CCHP system powered by organic Rankine cycle and photovoltaic thermal collector. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2021. 194: p. 117091.
[36] Haghghi, M.A., et al., Thermodynamic investigation of a new combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) system driven by parabolic trough solar collectors (PTSCs): A case study. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019. 163: p. 114329.
[37] Al-Sulaiman, F.A., I. Dincer, and F. Hamdullahpur, Exergy modeling of a new solar driven trigeneration system. Solar Energy, 2011. 85(9): p. 2228-2243.
[38] Bellos, E., C. Tzivanidis, and K.A. Antonopoulos, Parametric investigation and optimization of an innovative trigeneration system. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016. 127: p. 515-525.
[39] Dehghani, M.J. and C.K. Yoo, Modeling and extensive analysis of the energy and economics of cooling, heat, and power trigeneration (CCHP) from textile wastewater for industrial low-grade heat recovery. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020. 205: p. 112451.
[40] Ifaei, P., J. Rashidi, and C. Yoo, Thermoeconomic and environmental analyses of a low water consumption combined steam power plant and refrigeration chillers–Part 1: Energy and economic modelling and analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016. 123: p. 610-624.
[41] Gebreslassie, B.H., et al., Design of environmentally conscious absorption cooling systems via multi-objective optimization and life cycle assessment. Applied Energy, 2009. 86(9): p. 1712-1722.
[42] Shokati, N., F. Ranjbar, and M. Yari, Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: A comparative study. Renewable Energy, 2015. 83: p. 527-542.
[43] Wang, S., et al., Thermo-economic evaluations of dual pressure organic Rankine cycle (DPORC) driven by geothermal heat source. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2018. 10(6).
[44] Habibi, H., et al., Thermo-economic performance evaluation and multi-objective optimization of a screw expander-based cascade Rankine cycle integrated with parabolic trough solar collector. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2020. 180: p. 115827.
[45] Tzivanidis, C. and E. Bellos, The use of parabolic trough collectors for solar cooling–A case study for Athens climate. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2016. 8: p. 403-413.
[46] Tzivanidis, C., E. Bellos, and K.A. Antonopoulos, Energetic and financial investigation of a stand-alone solar-thermal Organic Rankine Cycle power plant. Energy conversion and management, 2016. 126: p. 421-433.
[47] Chen, H., et al., Thermodynamic and economic analyses of a solar-aided biomass-fired combined heat and power system. Energy, 2021. 214: p. 119023.
[48] Kurup, P. and C.S. Turchi, Parabolic trough collector cost update for the system advisor model (SAM). 2015, National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States).
[49] Haghghi, M.A., et al., Exergoeconomic evaluation of a system driven by parabolic trough solar collectors for combined cooling, heating, and power generation; a case study. Energy, 2020. 192: p. 116594.
[50] Chen, K., et al., Thermodynamic and economic comparison of novel parallel and serial combined cooling and power systems based on sCO2 cycle. Energy, 2021. 215: p. 119008.
[51] Kumar, A., et al., A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017. 69: p. 596-609.
[52] Sun, Z., C. Liu, and S. Wang, Multi-objective decision framework for comprehensive assessment of organic Rankine cycle system. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2020. 12(1).
[53] Liu, J., et al., Optimal selection of energy storage nodes based on improved cumulative prospect theory in China. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2020. 12(6).
[54] Wang, C.-N., et al., Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches for solar power plant location selection in Viet Nam. Energies, 2018. 11(6): p. 1504.
[55] He, C., et al., Combined cooling heating and power systems: Sustainability assessment under uncertainties. Energy, 2017. 139: p. 755-766.
[56] Ren, J., Multi-criteria decision making for the prioritization of energy systems under uncertainties after life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2018. 16: p. 45-57.
[57] Saryazdi, S.M.E., et al., Multi-objective optimization of preheating system of natural gas pressure reduction station with turbo-expander through the application of waste heat recovery system. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 2023. 38: p. 101509.
[58] Khan, M.A., A. Ali, and M. Zakaria, Analysis of power plants in China Pakistan economic corridor (CPEC): An application of analytic network process (ANP). Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2018. 10(6).
[59] Chalvatzis, K.J., et al., Sustainable resource allocation for power generation: The role of big data in enabling interindustry architectural innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019. 144: p. 381-393.
[60] Yazdani, M., et al., A novel integrated decision-making approach for the evaluation and selection of renewable energy technologies. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2018. 20: p. 403-420.
[61] Alizadeh, R., et al., Improving renewable energy policy planning and decision-making through a hybrid MCDM method. Energy Policy, 2020. 137: p. 111174.
[62] Ilbahar, E., S. Cebi, and C. Kahraman, A state-of-the-art review on multi-attribute renewable energy decision making. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2019. 25: p. 18-33.
[63] Brans, J.-P. and P. Vincke, Note—A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making). Management science, 1985. 31(6): p. 647-656.
[64] Diakoulaki, D. and F. Karangelis, Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost–benefit analysis of alternative scenarios for the power generation sector in Greece. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2007. 11(4): p. 716-727.
[65] Goumas, M. and V. Lygerou, An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000. 123(3): p. 606-613.
[66] Haralambopoulos, D. and H. Polatidis, Renewable energy projects: structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework. Renewable energy, 2003. 28(6): p. 961-973.
[67] Madlener, R., K. Kowalski, and S. Stagl, New ways for the integrated appraisal of national energy scenarios: The case of renewable energy use in Austria. Energy policy, 2007. 35(12): p. 6060-6074.
[68] Wang, J.-J., et al., Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2009. 13(9): p. 2263-2278.
[69] Alinezhad, A. and J. Khalili, New methods and applications in multiple attribute decision making (MADM). Vol. 277. 2019: Springer.
[70] Özkale, C., et al., Decision analysis application intended for selection of a power plant running on renewable energy sources. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2017. 70: p. 1011-1021.
[71] Khanlari, A. and M. Alhuyi Nazari, A review on the applications of multi-criteria decision-making approaches for power plant site selection. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2021: p. 1-17.
[72] Cavallaro, F., Multi-criteria decision aid to assess concentrated solar thermal technologies. Renewable Energy, 2009. 34(7): p. 1678-1685.
[73] Strantzali, E., K. Aravossis, and G.A. Livanos, Evaluation of future sustainable electricity generation alternatives: The case of a Greek island. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017. 76: p. 775-787.
[74] Lee, H.-C. and C.-T. Chang, Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2018. 92: p. 883-896.
[75] Ozsahin, I., D.U. Ozsahin, and B. Uzun, Applications of multi-criteria decision-making theories in healthcare and biomedical engineering. 2021: Academic Press.
[76] Saraswat, S. and A.K. Digalwar, Evaluation of energy alternatives for sustainable development of energy sector in India: An integrated Shannon’s entropy fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. Renewable Energy, 2021. 171: p. 58-74.
[77] Moya, E.Z., Innovative working fluids for parabolic trough collectors, in Advances in concentrating solar thermal research and technology. 2017, Elsevier. p. 75-106.
[78] Awan, A.B., et al., Commercial parabolic trough CSP plants: Research trends and technological advancements. Solar Energy, 2020. 211: p. 1422-1458.
[79] Wang, S., et al., Selection principle of working fluid for organic Rankine cycle based on environmental benefits and economic performance. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2020. 178: p. 115598.
[80] Mondragon, R., et al., Advances in New Heat Transfer Fluids From Numerical to Experimental Techniques. Chapter 11-New High-Temperature Heat Transfer and Thermal Storage Molten Salt–Based Nanofluids Preparation, Stabilization, and Characterization. 2017, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
[81] Syltherm®heat transfer fluids. Technical bulletin, available at:. <
dow.com>.
[82] Pejic, D. and M. Arsic, Minimization and maximization of functions: golden-section search in one dimension. Exploring the DataFlow Supercomputing Paradigm: Example Algorithms for Selected Applications, 2019: p. 55-90.
[83] Dudley, V.E., et al., Test results: SEGS LS-2 solar collector. 1994, Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States).
[84] Safarian, S. and F. Aramoun, Energy and exergy assessments of modified Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs). Energy reports, 2015. 1: p. 1-7.
[85] He, J., et al., Performance research on modified KCS (Kalina cycle system) 11 without throttle valve. Energy, 2014. 64: p. 389-397.
[86] Tariq, S., U. Safder, and C. Yoo, Exergy-based weighted optimization and smart decision-making for renewable energy systems considering economics, reliability, risk, and environmental assessments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022. 162: p. 112445.
[87] Tozlu, A., B. Gençaslan, and H. Özcan, Thermoeconomic analysis of a hybrid cogeneration plant with use of near-surface geothermal sources in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 2021. 176: p. 237-250.
