How life cycle assessment is key to reducing carbon emissions in architectural development: Circular economy and regenerative design

Dehvari, Hooman; Sahamiyan Moghaddam, Melika

doi:10.22059/ees.2023.2006245.1435

How life cycle assessment is key to reducing carbon emissions in architectural development: Circular economy and regenerative design

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Architecture , Khavaran Institute of Higher Education , Mashhad , Iran .

10.22059/ees.2023.2006245.1435

Abstract

In line with population growth and construction, the use of natural resources is increasing, which causes harm to nature, increases greenhouse gas emissions and global warming. As a result, the question arises whether architectural progress, in addition to energy optimization, has paid attention to issues related to building sustainability. In fact, the present research aims to evaluate the differences in energy consumption and compare life cycle assessment (LCA) in the context of the effects of architectural progress with the approach of creating sustainability in architecture. The results showed that architectural development in buildings has reduced CO2e carbon emissions in the energy sector by 1.3 times. However, the sector related to the materials of the modern house is almost 3.5 times more effective on the global warming potential (GWP) than the vernacular house. Nevertheless, after changing and using low-carbon materials, the impact of the material sector on GWP in the modern and vernacular houses decreased by 1.8 and 2.6 times, respectively. In fact, although the use of advanced materials has improved its thermal performance, these materials have increased its overall environmental impact in the GWP section by a factor of 2.9. As a result, the LCA study led to the creation of a regenerative design solution, the substitution of low-carbon materials, along with architectural development regarding energy optimization.

Keywords

References

[1] ‘IEA’, IEA, 2023. https://www.iea.org/reports/clean-energy-innovation/innovation-needs-in-the-sustainable-development-scenario (accessed Jun. 02, 2023).

[2] S. Saint Akadiri, T. S. Adebayo, M. Nakorji, W. Mwakapwa, E. M. Inusa, and O. O. Izuchukwu, ‘Impacts of globalization and energy consumption on environmental degradation: what is the way forward to achieving environmental sustainability targets in Nigeria?’, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 29, no. 40, pp. 60426–60439, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20180-7.

[3] E. Elbeltagi and H. Wefki, ‘Predicting energy consumption for residential buildings using ANN through parametric modeling’, Energy Reports, vol. 7, pp. 2534–2545, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.04.053.

[4] K. Verichev, M. Zamorano, and M. Carpio, ‘Effects of climate change on variations in climatic zones and heating energy consumption of residential buildings in southern Chile’, Energy Build., vol. 215, p. 109874, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109874.

[5] M. E. Shayan, G. Najafi, B. Ghobadian, and S. Gorjian, ‘Green cottage power supply and floating solar power plant : A Techno-Economic analysis’, Energy Equip. Syst., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 375–388, 2022.

[6] M. Ö. A. Akan, D. G. Dhavale, and J. Sarkis, ‘Greenhouse gas emissions in the construction industry: An analysis and evaluation of a concrete supply chain’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 167, pp. 1195–1207, 2017.

[7] X. Li, W. Xie, L. Xu, L. Li, C. Y. Jim, and T. Wei, ‘Holistic life-cycle accounting of carbon emissions of prefabricated buildings using LCA and BIM’, Energy Build., vol. 266, p. 112136, 2022.

[8] H. Wang, Y. Zhang, W. Gao, and S. Kuroki, ‘Life cycle environmental and cost performance of prefabricated buildings’, Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 2609, 2020.

[9] M. U. Hossain and S. Thomas Ng, ‘Influence of waste materials on buildings’ life cycle environmental impacts: Adopting resource recovery principle’, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 142, no. October 2018, pp. 10–23, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.010.

[10] S. Khoshnevis Yazdi and A. G. Dariani, ‘CO2 emissions, urbanisation and economic growth: evidence from Asian countries’, Econ. Res. Istraz. , vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 510–530, 2019, doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2018.1556107.

[11] R. Azari and H. Rashed-Ali, Research Methods in Building Science and Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021.

[12] W. Lu, M. Ye, R. Flanagan, and K. Ye, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures in International Construction Business: Trends and Prospects’, J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2016, doi: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001034.

[13] W. Lu and H. Yuan, ‘A framework for understanding waste management studies in construction’, Waste Manag., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1252–1260, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.018.

[14] O. F. Kofoworola and S. H. Gheewala, ‘Estimation of construction waste generation and management in Thailand’, Waste Manag., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 731–738, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.07.004.

[15] W. Lu, H. Yuan, J. Li, J. J. L. Hao, X. Mi, and Z. Ding, ‘An empirical investigation of construction and demolition waste generation rates in Shenzhen city, South China’, Waste Manag., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 680–687, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.12.004.

[16] M. Behera, S. K. Bhattacharyya, A. K. Minocha, R. Deoliya, and S. Maiti, ‘Recycled aggregate from C&D waste & its use in concrete - A breakthrough towards sustainability in construction sector: A review’, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 68, pp. 501–516, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.003.

[17] G. L. F. Benachio, M. do C. D. Freitas, and S. F. Tavares, ‘Circular economy in the construction industry: A systematic literature review’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 260, p. 121046, 2020.

[18] P. Agamuthu, ‘Challenges in sustainable management of construction and demolition waste’, Waste Management & Research, vol. 26, no. 6. SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England, pp. 491–492, 2008.

[19] P. Jain, J. Powell, and T. Tolaymat, ‘Methodology to estimate the quantity, composition, and management of construction and demolition debris in the United States’, US Environ. Prot. Agency Washington, DC, USA, 2015.

[20] H. Wu, J. Zuo, G. Zillante, J. Wang, and H. Yuan, ‘Status quo and future directions of construction and demolition waste research: A critical review’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 240, p. 118163, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118163.

[21] M. Bernardo, M. C. Gomes, and J. de Brito, ‘Demolition waste generation for development of a regional management chain model’, Waste Manag., vol. 49, pp. 156–169, 2016.

[22] N. Roussat, J. Méhu, M. Abdelghafour, and P. Brula, ‘Leaching behaviour of hazardous demolition waste’, Waste Manag., vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 2032–2040, 2008.

[23] S. K. Kaliyavaradhan and T.-C. Ling, ‘Potential of CO 2 sequestration through construction and demolition (C&D) waste—An overview’, J. CO2 Util., vol. 20, no. May, pp. 234–242, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2017.05.014.

[24] M. S. Jain, ‘A mini review on generation, handling, and initiatives to tackle construction and demolition waste in India’, Environ. Technol. Innov., vol. 22, p. 101490, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101490.

[25] S. Shahidan, M. A. M. Azmi, K. Kupusamy, S. S. M. Zuki, and N. Ali, ‘Utilizing Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste as Recycled Aggregates (RA) in Concrete’, Procedia Eng., vol. 174, pp. 1028–1035, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.255.

[26] C. S. Vieira, ‘Valorization of fine-grain construction and demolition (C&D) waste in geosynthetic reinforced structures’, Waste and biomass valorization, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1615–1626, 2020.

[27] R. V. Silva, J. de Brito, and R. K. Dhir, ‘Use of recycled aggregates arising from construction and demolition waste in new construction applications’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 236, p. 117629, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117629.

[28] G. A. Aguilar‐Hernandez, S. Deetman, S. Merciai, J. F. D. Rodrigues, and A. Tukker, ‘Global distribution of material inflows to in‐use stocks in 2011 and its implications for a circularity transition’, J. Ind. Ecol., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1447–1461, 2021.

[29] P. Schröder, A. Lemille, and P. Desmond, ‘Making the circular economy work for human development’, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 156, no. September 2019, p. 104686, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104686.

[30] B. Rabta, ‘An Economic Order Quantity inventory model for a product with a circular economy indicator’, Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 140, p. 106215, 2020.

[31] E. Hysa, A. Kruja, N. U. Rehman, and R. Laurenti, ‘Circular economy innovation and environmental sustainability impact on economic growth: An integrated model for sustainable development’, Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 4831, 2020.

[32] C. Zhang, M. Hu, F. Di Maio, B. Sprecher, X. Yang, and A. Tukker, ‘An overview of the waste hierarchy framework for analyzing the circularity in construction and demolition waste management in Europe’, Sci. Total Environ., vol. 803, p. 149892, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149892.

[33] E. Ingemarsdotter, E. Jamsin, G. Kortuem, and R. Balkenende, ‘Circular strategies enabled by the internet of things-a framework and analysis of current practice’, Sustain., vol. 11, no. 20, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11205689.

[34] L. C. M. Eberhardt, H. Birgisdottir, and M. Birkved, ‘Potential of Circular Economy in Sustainable Buildings’, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 471, no. 9, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092051.

[35] L. Charlotte et al., ‘Building design and construction strategies for a circular economy Building design and construction strategies for a circular economy’, Archit. Eng. Des. Manag., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–21, 2020, doi: 10.1080/17452007.2020.1781588.

[36] J. Kanters, ‘Circular building design: An analysis of barriers and drivers for a circular building sector’, Buildings, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.3390/BUILDINGS10040077.

[37] P. Hopkinson, H. M. Chen, K. Zhou, Y. Wang, and D. Lam, ‘Recovery and reuse of structural products from end-of-life buildings’, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng. Sustain., vol. 172, no. 3, pp. 119–128, 2018, doi: 10.1680/jensu.18.00007.

[38] P. Ghisellini, C. Cialani, and S. Ulgiati, ‘A review on circular economy : the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 114, pp. 11–32, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007.

[39] S. M. H. Honarvar, M. Golabchi, and M. B. Ledari, ‘Building circularity as a measure of sustainability in the old and modern architecture: A case study of architecture development in the hot and dry climate’, Energy Build., vol. 275, p. 112469, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112469.

[40] I. S. Jawahir and R. Bradley, ‘Technological elements of circular economy and the principles of 6R-based closed-loop material flow in sustainable manufacturing’, Procedia Cirp, vol. 40, pp. 103–108, 2016.

[41] J. Korhonen, C. Nuur, A. Feldmann, and S. E. Birkie, ‘Circular economy as an essentially contested concept’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 175, pp. 544–552, 2018.

[42] P. Morseletto, ‘Restorative and regenerative: Exploring the concepts in the circular economy’, J. Ind. Ecol., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 763–773, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1111/jiec.12987.

[43] H. König and M. L. De Cristofaro, ‘Benchmarks for life cycle costs and life cycle assessment of residential buildings’, Build. Res. Inf., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 558–580, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1080/09613218.2012.702017.

[44] M. N. Nwodo and C. J. Anumba, ‘A review of life cycle assessment of buildings using a systematic approach’, Build. Environ., vol. 162, no. July, p. 106290, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106290.

[45] A. Hollberg, G. Genova, and G. Habert, ‘Evaluation of BIM-based LCA results for building design’, Autom. Constr., vol. 109, no. September 2019, p. 102972, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102972.

[46] O. Ortiz, F. Castells, and G. Sonnemann, ‘Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA’, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 28–39, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012.

[47] L. Ben-Alon, V. Loftness, K. A. Harries, and E. C. Hameen, ‘Life cycle assessment (LCA) of natural vs conventional building assemblies’, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 144, p. 110951, 2021.

[48] F. Rezaei, C. Bulle, and P. Lesage, ‘Integrating building information modeling and life cycle assessment in the early and detailed building design stages’, Build. Environ., vol. 153, pp. 158–167, 2019.

[49] N. Llantoy, M. Chafer, and L. F. Cabeza, ‘A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of different insulation materials for buildings in the continental Mediterranean climate’, Energy Build., vol. 225, p. 110323, 2020.

[50] L. Ben-Alon, V. Loftness, K. A. Harries, G. DiPietro, and E. C. Hameen, ‘Cradle to site Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of natural vs conventional building materials: A case study on cob earthen material’, Build. Environ., vol. 160, no. January, p. 106150, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.05.028.

[51] A. T. Balasbaneh and M. Z. Ramli, ‘A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete and steel-prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction structures in Malaysia’, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 27, no. 34, pp. 43186–43201, 2020.

[52] F. Zhou, Y. Ning, X. Guo, and S. Guo, ‘Analyze Differences in Carbon Emissions from Traditional and Prefabricated Buildings Combining the Life Cycle’, Buildings, vol. 13, no. 4, 2023, doi: 10.3390/buildings13040874.

[53] A. A. Dani, K. Roy, R. Masood, Z. Fang, and J. B. P. Lim, ‘A Comparative Study on the Life Cycle Assessment of New Zealand Residential Buildings’, Buildings, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12010050.

[54] Z. Duan, Q. Huang, Q. Sun, and Q. Zhang, ‘Comparative life cycle assessment of a reinforced concrete residential building with equivalent cross laminated timber alternatives in China’, J. Build. Eng., vol. 62, p. 105357, 2022.

[55] X. Luo, M. Ren, J. Zhao, Z. Wang, J. Ge, and W. Gao, ‘Life cycle assessment for carbon emission impact analysis for the renovation of old residential areas’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 367, p. 132930, 2022.

[56] C. X. Chen, F. Pierobon, S. Jones, I. Maples, Y. Gong, and I. Ganguly, ‘Comparative life cycle assessment of mass timber and concrete residential buildings: A case study in China’, Sustain., vol. 14, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14010144.

[57] H. Li, Z. Luo, X. Xu, Y. Cang, and L. Yang, ‘Assessing the embodied carbon reduction potential of straw bale rural houses by hybrid life cycle assessment: A four-case study’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 303, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127002.

[58] S. M. Hosseinian and M. Faghani, ‘Assessing the effect of structural parameters and building site in achieving low carbon building materialization using a life-cycle assessment approach’, J. Build. Eng., vol. 44, p. 103318, 2021.

[59] X. Yang, S. Zhang, and K. Wang, ‘Quantitative study of life cycle carbon emissions from 7 timber buildings in China’, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1721–1734, 2021.

[60] A. Pakdel, H. Ayatollahi, and S. Sattary, ‘Embodied energy and CO2 emissions of life cycle assessment (LCA) in the traditional and contemporary Iranian construction systems’, J. Build. Eng., vol. 39, no. February, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102310.

[61] J. L. Hao et al., ‘Carbon emission reduction in prefabrication construction during materialization stage: A BIM-based life-cycle assessment approach’, Sci. Total Environ., vol. 723, p. 137870, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137870.

[62] Y. Dong et al., ‘Comparative whole building life cycle assessment of energy saving and carbon reduction performance of reinforced concrete and timber stadiums-a case study in China’, Sustain., vol. 12, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12041566.

[63] Z. Chen, H. Gu, R. D. Bergman, and S. Liang, ‘Comparative life-cycle assessment of a high-rise mass timber building with an equivalent reinforced concrete alternative using the athena impact estimator for buildings’, Sustain., vol. 12, no. 11, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12114708.

[64] K. Lu et al., ‘Development of a carbon emissions analysis framework using building information modeling and life cycle assessment for the construction of hospital projects’, Sustain., vol. 11, no. 22, pp. 1–18, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11226274.

[65] W. M. S. Wan Omar, ‘A hybrid life cycle assessment of embodied energy and carbon emissions from conventional and industrialised building systems in Malaysia’, Energy Build., vol. 167, pp. 253–268, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.045.

[66] A. Atmaca, ‘Life cycle assessment and cost analysis of residential buildings in south east of turkey: Part 1—review and methodology’, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 831–846, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11367-016-1050-8.

[67] C. K. Chau, T. M. Leung, and W. Y. Ng, ‘A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings’, Appl. Energy, vol. 143, pp. 395–413, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.023.

[68] X. Zhang and F. Wang, ‘Life-cycle assessment and control measures for carbon emissions of typical buildings in China’, Build. Environ., vol. 86, pp. 89–97, 2015.

[69] N. C. Onat, M. Kucukvar, and O. Tatari, ‘Scope-based carbon footprint analysis of U.S. residential and commercial buildings: An input-output hybrid life cycle assessment approach’, Build. Environ., vol. 72, pp. 53–62, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.10.009.

[70] U. Iyer-Raniga and J. P. C. Wong, ‘Evaluation of whole life cycle assessment for heritage buildings in Australia’, Build. Environ., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 138–149, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.08.001.

[71] K. Safari and H. AzariJafari, ‘Challenges and opportunities for integrating BIM and LCA: Methodological choices and framework development’, Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 67, no. December 2020, p. 102728, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102728.

[72] C. Paper and M. Stamenkovi, ‘REGENERATIVE DESIGN AS AN APPROACH FOR BUILDING PRACTICE’, in 26th International Conf. Ecol. Truth Environ. Res. – EcoTER’18, 2019., 2019, no. September.

[73] W. Middleton, A. Habibi, S. Shankar, and F. Ludwig, ‘Characterizing Regenerative Aspects of Living Root Bridges’, Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 3267, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12083267.

[74] L. A. Akanbi et al., ‘Resources, Conservation & Recycling Salvaging building materials in a circular economy : A BIM-based whole-life performance estimator’, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 129, no. May 2017, pp. 175–186, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.026.

[75] N. Somu, G. Raman M R, and K. Ramamritham, ‘A deep learning framework for building energy consumption forecast’, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 137, no. November 2020, p. 110591, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110591.

[76] M. Bourdeau, X. Qiang Zhai, E. Nefzaoui, X. Guo, and P. Chatellier, ‘Modeling and forecasting building energy consumption: A review of data-driven techniques’, Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 48, no. April, p. 101533, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101533.

[77] M. Bughio, M. S. Khan, W. A. Mahar, and T. Schuetze, ‘Impact of passive energy efficiency measures on cooling energy demand in an architectural campus building in karachi, pakistan’, Sustain., vol. 13, no. 13, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13137251.

[78] P. Hoseinzadeh et al., ‘Energy performance of building integrated photovoltaic high-rise building: Case study, Tehran, Iran’, Energy Build., vol. 235, p. 110707, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110707.

[79] M. Li, J. Cao, M. Xiong, J. Li, X. Feng, and F. Meng, ‘Different responses of cooling energy consumption in office buildings to climatic change in major climate zones of China’, Energy Build., vol. 173, pp. 38–44, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.037.

[80] V. Pereira, J. Santos, F. Leite, and P. Escórcio, ‘Using BIM to improve building energy efficiency – A scientometric and systematic review’, Energy Build., vol. 250, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111292.

[81] C. D. Frenette, C. Bulle, R. Beauregard, A. Salenikovich, and D. Derome, ‘Using life cycle assessment to derive an environmental index for light-frame wood wall assemblies’, Build. Environ., vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 2111–2122, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.03.009.

[82] A. M. Moncaster and K. E. Symons, ‘A method and tool for “cradle to grave” embodied carbon and energy impacts of UK buildings in compliance with the new TC350 standards’, Energy Build., vol. 66, pp. 514–523, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.046.

[83] D. A. Ramos Huarachi, G. Gonçalves, A. C. de Francisco, M. H. G. Canteri, and C. M. Piekarski, ‘Life cycle assessment of traditional and alternative bricks: A review’, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., vol. 80, no. September 2019, p. 106335, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106335.

[84] B. D. Olagunju and O. A. Olanrewaju, ‘Comparison of life cycle assessment tools in cement production’, South African J. Ind. Eng., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 70–83, 2020, doi: 10.7166/31-4-2317.

[85] R. J. Cole and L. Fedoruk, ‘Shifting from net-zero to net-positive energy buildings’, Build. Res. Inf., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 111–120, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/09613218.2014.950452.