Proposing a quantitative approach to measure the success of energy management systems in accordance with ISO 50001: 2011 using an analytical hierarchy process (AHP)

Author

School of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science & amp; Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

ISO 50001: 2011 provides an integrated and systematic framework to plan, implement, operate, certify, and maintain energy management systems (EMSs). Evaluation of organizations in relation to meeting the standard requirements is performed by an auditing qualitative approach. In this research, a quantitative approach has been proposed and implemented to assess organizations and rank them based on the related capabilities of the EMS. Initially, ISO 50001 was accurately reviewed to extract requirements. Later, an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was used to perform pair-wise comparison and to specify the importance factors of ISO 50001 requirements. A number of Iranian oil and gas plants were evaluated in accordance with the specified requirements of ISO 50001. The results of the evaluation were used to rank the considered plant in capabilities of the EMS. In addition, it was used to specify which areas of ISO 50001 need more attention in the considered plants. Finally, the improvement approaches were proposed to enable Iranian oil and gas plants to increase the effectiveness of the implemented EMS.

Keywords


[1]Shushakov A.A., Natalyin S.G., Katrich N.M., Kaybyshev R.R., Figurin A.L., Chikin V.V., Boychuk I.F., Implementation of Energy Management System According to ISO 50001:2011 in Vertically Organized Oil Companies: JSC Gazprom Neft Approach, Neftyanoe khozyaystvo - Oil Industry (2013) 12: 66-69.

[2]Brown M., Desai D., The ISO 50001 Energy Management Standard: What is it and how is it changing, Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment (2014) 34(2):16-25.

[3]Chiu T. Y., Lo S. L., Establishing an Integration-Energy-Practice Model to Improve Energy Efficiency in ISO 50001 Energy Management Systems: A Case Study for a Networking Products Company. 品質學報 (2015) 22(1):15-28.

[4]Chiu T. Y., Lo S. L., Tsai Y. Y., Establishing an Integration-Energy-Practice Model for Improving Energy Performance Indicators in ISO 50001 Energy Management Systems, Energies (2012) 5(12):5324-5339.

[5]Gopalakrishnan B., Ramamoorthy K., Crowe E., Chaudhari S., Latif H., A Structured Approach for Facilitating the Implementation of ISO 50001 Standard in the Manufacturing Sector, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments (2014) 7:154-165.

[6]Jovanović B., Filipović J., ISO 50001 Standard-Based Energy Management Maturity Model-Proposal and Validation in Industry, Journal of Cleaner Production (2016) 112:2744-2755.

[7]Karcher P., Jochem R., Success Factors and Organizational Approaches for the Implementation of Energy Management Systems According to ISO 50001, The TQM Journal (2015) 27(4):361-381.

[8]Martl M., Energy Monitoring System EMS as an Integrated Approach by LINGL for Energy Management in Accordance with DIN-EN 16001 or ISO 50001, In Ceramic Forum International (2012) 89.

[9]Rodriguez A. R., Alvarez D. M., Paneda X. G., Alvarez A., Carvajal D. A., Orueta G. D., Paneda A. G., Service To Manage the Efficient Driving of Combustion Vehicle Fleets to Support ISO 50001, IEEE Latin America Transactions (2015) 13(4): 1198-1204.

[10]Zając P., Evaluation of Automatic Identification Systems According to ISO 50001: 2011, In Progress in Automation, Robotics and Measuring Techniques, Springer International Publishing (2015) 345-355.