Thermodynamic and economic comparison of photovoltaic electricity generation with and without self-cleaning photovoltaic panels

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of optics and laser, University of Bonab, Bonab, Iran

2 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia, Iran

3 Mechanical Engineering Group, ZT Company, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In this study, thermodynamic and economic analysis of a photovoltaic electricity generation system (PVEGS) with and without self-cleaning panels is reported. In the first part, thermodynamic analyses are used to characterize the performance of the system. In the second part, the economic comparison of photovoltaic electricity generation with and without self-cleaning panels is carried out for all climate zones of Iran. A computer simulation program using EES software is developed to model the solar photovoltaic electricity generation system in four different climates of Iran. The solar photovoltaic system provides electricity during the year. Our goal is to point out the potential of electricity production using conventional panels compared to self-cleaning panels under the same condition. The analysis involves the specification of the effects of varying solar radiation intensity (SRI) on the electricity generation rate of the photovoltaic electricity generation system. The average output power values for the solar photovoltaic system with self-cleaning panels and the solar photovoltaic system without self-cleaning panels are found to be 50767 and 48120 kWh/year, respectively, which means that the solar photovoltaic system with self-cleaning panels has the higher performance than the solar photovoltaic system without self-cleaning panels in all climate zones of Iran.

Keywords


[1] Aiman Roslizar, Stephan Dottermusch, Felix Vüllers, Maryna N. Kavalenka, Markus Guttmann, Marc Schneider, Ulrich W. Paetzolda, Hendrik Hölscher, Bryce S. Richards, Efthymios Klampaftis. (2019). Self-cleaning performance of superhydrophobic hot-embossed fluoropolymer films for photovoltaic modules. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 189, 188–196.
[2] A. Syafiq, A.K. Pandey, N.N. Adzman, Nasrudin Abd Rahim. (2018). Advances in approaches and methods for self-cleaning of solar photovoltaic panels. Solar Energy, 162, 597–619.
[3] S. Sutha, Sisira Suresh, Baldev Raj, K.R. Ravi. (2017). Transparent alumina-based super hydrophobic self–cleaning coatings for solar cell cover glass applications. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 165, 128–137.
[4] Ioannis Arabatzis, Nadia Todorova, Ioanna Fasaki, Chrysovalanti Tsesmeli, Antonis Peppas, Wen Xin Li, Zhiwei Zhao. (2018). Photocatalytic, self-cleaning, anti-reflective coating for photovoltaic panels: Characterization and monitoring in real conditions. Solar Energy, 159, 251–259.
[5] M.M. Fouad, Lamia A. Shihata, El Sayed I. Morgan. (2017). an integrated review of factors influencing the performance of photovoltaic panels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 1499–1511.
[6] Rahul Rawat, Ravita Lamba, S.C. Kaushik. (2017). Thermodynamic study of solar photovoltaic energy conversion: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71, 630–638.
[7] Rahul Rawat, S.C. Kaushik, O.S. Sastry, Y.K. Singh, B. Bora. (2016). Energetic and exergetic performance analysis of CdS/CdTe based photovoltaic technology in real operating conditions of composite climate. Energy Conversion and Management, 110, 42–50.
[8] Erdem Cuce, Pinar Mert Cuce, Ibrahim Hakki Karakas, Tulin Bali. (2017). An accurate model for photovoltaic (PV) modules to determine electrical Characteristics and thermodynamic performance parameters. Energy Conversion and Management, 146, 205–216.
[9] Mehmet Özalp; Mutlucan Bayat. (2017). A comparative thermodynamic analysis of different exergetic efficiency methods for a solar photovoltaic module. International Journal of Exergy (IJEX), 24(2/3/4).
[10] Iran Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Organization (SATBA) Annual report, 2010-2017.
[11] Anand S. Joshi, Ibrahim Dincer, Bale V. Reddy. (2009). Thermodynamic assessment of photovoltaic systems. Solar Energy, 83, 1139–1149.
[12] Iranian Ministry of Energy Annual report, 2014.
[13] Jibran Khan, Mudassar H. Arsalan. (2016). Solar power technologies for sustainable electricity generation – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 414–425.