Selection of the optimum prime mover and the working fluid in a regenerative organic rankine cycle


Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran


A regenerative organic Rankine cycle (RORC) is modeled and optimized for the use of waste heat recovery from a prime mover (PM). Three PMs including, a diesel engine, a gas engine, and a microturbine are selected in this study. Four refrigerants including isobutane, R123, R134a, and R245fa are selected. The nominal capacity of the PM, PM operating partial load, turbine inlet pressure, condenser pressure, refrigerant mass flow rate, pump efficiency, turbine efficiency, and regenerator effectiveness are considered as the decision variables. Then, the Genetic Algorithm is applied to maximize the thermal efficiency and minimize the total annual cost (TAC), simultaneously. The optimum results demonstrate that the best working fluid and the PM are, respectively, R123 and the diesel engine, which have a thermal efficiency of 0.50 and a TAC of $170,276/year. The optimum results are compared with each of the other studied cases. For example, the optimum result in the case of a diesel engine working with R123 shows a 2% and 2.52% improvement in the thermal efficiency and the TAC, respectively, in comparison to the case of a gas engine working with R123. Furthermore, a 26% and an 18.38% improvement in the thermal efficiency and the TAC are found when the best-studied cycle is compared with a microturbine and R123.


[1] Mago P. J., Exergetic Evaluation of an Organic Rankine Cycle Using Medium-Grade Waste Heat, Energy Sources, Part A, Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects (2012) 34(19): 1768-1780.

[2] Carcasci, Carlo, Riccardo Ferraro, and Edoardo Miliotti, Thermodynamic Analysis of an Organic Rankine Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery from Gas Turbines, Energy  (2014) 65: 91-100.

[3] Yun E., Park H., Yoon S.Y., Kim K.C., Dual Parallel Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) System for High Efficiency Waste Heat Recovery in Marine Application, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology (2015)29(6): 2509-2515.

[4] Gong X. W., Wang X. Q., Li Y. R., Wu C. M., Thermodynamic Performance Analysis of a Coupled Transcritical and Subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle System for Waste Heat Recovery, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology (2015) 29(7): 3017-3029.

[5] Coskun A., Ali B., Mehmet K., Thermodynamic Analysis and Optimization of Various Power Cycles for a Geothermal Resource, Energy Sources, Part A, Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects (2016) 38(6): 850-856.

[6] Li Y.R., Mei-Tang D., Chun-Mei W., Shuang-Ying W., Chao L., Potential of Organic Rankine Cycle Using Zeotropic Mixtures as Working Fluids for Waste Heat Recovery, Energy  (2014) 77: 509-519.

[7] Umesh K., Karimi M.N., Asjad M., Parametric Optimisation of the Organic Rankine Cycle for Power Generation from Low-Grade Waste Heat, International Journal of Sustainable Energy (2016) 35(8): 774-792.

[8] Rahbar K., Saad M., Raya K. A., Moazami N., Modelling and Optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle Based on a Small-Scale Radial Inflow Turbine, Energy Conversion and Management  (2015) 91: 186-198.

[9] Roy J. P., Mishra M. K., Ashok M., Parametric Optimization and Performance Analysis of a Regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle Using Low–Grade Waste Heat for Power Generation, International Journal of Green Energy (2011) 8(2): 173-196.

[10] Hajabdollahi Z., Hajabdollahi F., Tehrani M., Hajabdollahi H., Thermo-Economic Environmental Optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle for Diesel Waste Heat Recovery, Energy  (2013) 63: 142-151.

[11] Yang M.H., Rong-Hua Y., Thermo-economic Optimization of an Organic Rankine Cycle System for Large Marine Diesel Engine Waste Heat Recovery, Energy  (2015) 82: 256-268.

[12] Yang M.H., Rong-Hua Y., Analyzing the Optimization of an Organic Rankine Cycle System for Recovering Waste Heat from a Large Marine Engine Containing a Cooling Water System, Energy Conversion and Management  (2014) 88: 999-1010.

[13] Michel F., Kheiri A., Pelloux-Prayer S., Performance Optimization of Low-Temperature Power Generation by Supercritical ORCs (Organic Rankine Cycles) Using Low GWP (Global Warming Potential) Working Fluids, Energy (2014) 67: 513-526.

[14] Yang M.H., Rong-Hua Y., Thermodynamic and Economic Performances Optimization of an Organic Rankine Cycle System Utilizing Exhaust Gas of a Large Marine Diesel Engine, Applied Energy  (2015) 149: 1-12.

[15] Yongqiang F.,, Zhang Y., Li B., Yang J., Shi Y., Comparison between Regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle (RORC) and Basic Organic Rankine Cycle (BORC) Based on Thermoeconomic Multi-Objective Optimization Considering Exergy Efficiency and Levelized Energy Cost (LEC), Energy Conversion and Management  (2015) 96: 58-71.

[16] Spayde E., Pedro J. M., Evaluation of a Solar-Powered Organic Rankine Cycle Using Dry Organic Working Fluids, Cogent Engineering (2015) 2(1): 1085300.

[17] Salcedo R., Antipova E., Boer D., Jiménez L., Guillén-Gosálbez G., Multi-Objective Optimization of Solar Rankine Cycles Coupled with Reverse Osmosis Desalination Considering Economic and Life Cycle Environmental Concerns, Desalination  (2012) 286: 358-371.

[18] Boyaghchi A. F., Heidarnejad P., Thermoeconomic Assessment and Multi Objective Optimization of a Solar Micro CCHP Based on Organic Rankine Cycle for Domestic Application, Energy Conversion and Management  (2015) 97: 224-234.

[19] Hajabdollahi H., Ganjehkaviri A., Nazri Mohd Jaafar M.. Thermo-Economic Optimization of RSORC (Regenerative Solar Organic Rankine cycle) Considering Hourly Analysis, Energy (2015).

[20] Imran M., Muhammad U., Byung-Sik P., Hyouck-Ju K., Dong-Hyun L., Multi-Objective Optimization of Evaporator of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for Low Temperature Geothermal Heat Source, Applied Thermal Engineering  (2015) 80: 1-9.

[21] Walraven D., Ben L., William D., Economic System Optimization of Air-Cooled Organic Rankine Cycles Powered by Low-Temperature Geothermal Heat Sources, Energy  (2015) 80: 104-113.

[22] El-Wakil M.M. Powerplant Technology, McGraw-Hill (2002).

[23] ASHRAE Handbook Cogeneration Systems and Engine and Turbine Drives (1999).

[24] Srinivas N., Deb K., Multiobjective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms, Journal of Evolutionary Computing (1994) 2(3): 221–248.

[25] Deb K., Goel T., Controlled Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithms for Better Convergence, in Proceedings of The First International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, Zurich (2001)385–399.

[26] Deb K., Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK (2001).

[27] Hajabdollahi F., Hajabdollahi Z., Hajabdollahi H., Soft Computing Based Multi-Objective Optimization of Steam Cycle Power Plant Using NSGA-II and ANN, Applied Soft Computing (2012): 12(11): 3648-3655.

[28], [Web Site of Iranian Fuel Conservation Organization].

[29] Xu J., Yu C., Critical Temperature Criterion for Selection of Working Fluids for Subcritical Pressure Organic Rankine Cycles, Energy (2014)74: 719-733.

[30] Branke J., Miettinen K., Slowinski R., Multiobjective Optimization, Interactive and Evolutionary Approaches, Springer (2008) 5252.

[31] Khorasani Nejad E., Hajabdollahi F., Hajabdollahi Z., Hajabdollahi H., Thermo‐Economic Optimization of Gas Turbine Power Plant with Details in Intercooler, Heat Transfer-Asian Research (2013) 42 (8): 704-723.

[32] Mokhtari H., Esmaieli A., Hajabdollahi H., Thermo‐Economic Analysis and Multiobjective Optimization of Dual Pressure Combined Cycle Power Plant with Supplementary Firing, Heat Transfer-Asian Research (2016)45(1):59-84.